← Back to Blog

💡Light Quality

Light isn’t just for seeing; it sets your circadian rhythm, fuels vitamin D production, and impacts long-term health. Modern lighting often disrupts these natural systems through excessive blue light, flicker, and poor spectral quality. This post breaks down the three light-responsive systems (visual, circadian, skin), explains key testing parameters like color temperature, flicker %, and UV content, and shows how to create lighting environments that support sleep, mood, and overall well-being.

Introduction

Light is fundamental to human health beyond simply enabling vision, playing a vital role in regulating our physiological and psychological functions. Three main bodily systems utilize light: the visual system for sight, the non-image-forming system for circadian rhythm regulation, and the skin system for vitamin D synthesis. Our goal is to develop environments that help optimize all three of these systems.

However, our modern lifestyle, characterized by limited daytime exposure to natural light and excessive artificial light exposure, especially at night, disrupts these natural processes. Blue-rich light from modern LED bulbs and electronic screens can cause oxidative stress to the eyes and suppress melatonin production, a powerful antioxidant linked to sleep quality and protection against numerous health conditions, including cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.

The solution requires a comprehensive approach: using warm light sources after sunset, emphasizing bright daytime light exposure, and ensuring sensible sun exposure for vitamin D production. Building design should maximize natural daylighting through windows, skylights, and other apertures to support both human health and energy efficiency.

The Three Light-Responsive Systems

The Visual System: Seeing and Processing Light

The visual system is our most obvious interaction with light, but its health depends on more than just adequate brightness. Light quality significantly impacts visual comfort and long-term eye health. Poor lighting conditions, characterized by excessive flicker, inadequate intensity, or imbalanced spectral distribution, can cause immediate symptoms like eye strain, headaches, and visual fatigue, while potentially contributing to longer-term vision problems.

Modern artificial lighting presents unique challenges to visual health. LED lights, while energy-efficient, often contain significant blue light content and can exhibit high flicker rates that stress the visual system even when imperceptible. Poor color rendering forces our eyes to work harder to distinguish colors accurately, leading to fatigue. Additionally, UV emissions from certain light sources can cause cumulative damage to the eyes, particularly when exposure occurs at close distances over extended periods.

Optimal visual lighting requires balanced intensity, minimal flicker, excellent color rendering, and a smooth spectral distribution without significant gaps that could cause subtle visual discomfort.

💡Quick Tip: Use your smartphone camera's slow-motion feature to check for flicker in LED lights. Hold it up to the light and record for 5 seconds. When you watch it back you will be able to see how much it flickers; it has significant flicker that could be causing eye strain. Start by switching out lightbulbs where you spend the most time (bedroom, office, living room, kitchen) with low flicker bulbs. (I like Sunsy or Healthy Home Circadian Bulbs)

The Non-Image Forming System: Circadian Rhythm Regulation

Beyond vision, our eyes contain specialized melanopsin photoreceptors that don't contribute to sight but instead regulate our internal biological clock. This non-image-forming visual system is exquisitely sensitive to light timing, intensity, and spectral composition, particularly blue wavelengths around 480nm.

Circadian disruption from poor lighting practices has become a modern epidemic. Our typical indoor environments provide insufficient daytime light exposure (often only 50-500 lux compared to the 1000+ lux needed for proper circadian entrainment), while evening exposure to blue-rich artificial light suppresses melatonin production. This powerful antioxidant hormone not only regulates sleep but also protects against cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and other chronic conditions. 

Ideally, we want high circadian stimulation during daytime hours to maintain alertness and proper circadian timing, while evening lighting should have minimal circadian impact to allow natural melatonin production. This requires cooler, blue-rich light during working hours to support alertness, while warmer light in evening and morning hours protects sleep quality.

💡Quick Tip: Start your day with 10-15 minutes of bright outdoor light exposure (even on cloudy days) to kickstart your circadian rhythm. Position your workspace near a window when possible, and take regular breaks to look outside throughout the day.

The Skin System: Vitamin D Synthesis and Phototherapy

Our skin represents the third major interface between our bodies and light, primarily through ultraviolet radiation exposure for vitamin D synthesis. This often-overlooked system requires careful balance, adequate UV exposure for health benefits, while avoiding the risks of excessive exposure.

Sensible sun exposure can provide remarkable health benefits beyond vitamin D production. Just 20-30 minutes of midday summer sun exposure can fulfill daily vitamin D requirements for light-skinned individuals, while also supporting immune function, mood regulation, and potentially reducing risks of certain cancers and autoimmune conditions. However, timing and duration matter enormously; brief midday exposure when UV is most intense actually requires less total time than prolonged exposure during weaker UV periods.

Indoor lighting typically contributes minimal UV exposure, though certain artificial sources can emit concerning levels of UV radiation when used at close distances. Most quality indoor lighting should have minimal UV emissions to avoid cumulative damage.

Light Quality Testing Parameters

To ensure lighting supports all three light-responsive systems, we evaluate multiple critical parameters, ranked by health risk level:

High Risk Factors

Color Temperature (Blue Light Content)

  • What it measures: The apparent warmth or coolness of light, measured in Kelvin (K)
  • How we test: Using colorimeters or spectrophotometers
  • Health impact: Blue-rich light (higher K values) can suppress melatonin production at night
  • Optimal values: Warmer light (2700-3000K) in the evening and morning; cooler light (4000-5000K) during daytime working hours

Flicker Percentage

  • What it measures: Variation in light output over time, quantifying intensity fluctuations
  • How we test: Using flicker meters or specialized oscilloscopes that detect both visible flicker (below 80Hz) and invisible flicker (up to 1000Hz)
  • Health impact: Can cause headaches, eye strain, migraines, and neurological issues, even when not visibly noticeable
  • Optimal values: High-quality lighting should have flicker percentages below 1%

UV Content

  • What it measures: Ultraviolet radiation emissions, including UVA (315-400nm) and UVB (280-315nm) wavelengths
  • How we test: Using specialized UV radiometers or spectroradiometers with UV sensors
  • Health impact: UVB emissions from close-distance lighting can exceed safety limits, causing eye damage, skin aging, and increased skin cancer risk
  • Optimal values: Minimal UV emissions, especially UVB, for indoor lighting

Medium Risk Factors

Light Intensity

  • What it measures: The Amount of light energy falling on a surface
  • How we test: Using lux meters measuring luminous flux per unit area
  • Health impact: Insufficient intensity causes eye strain and fatigue; excessive brightness causes glare and discomfort
  • Optimal values: 300-500 lux for office work, 100-200 lux for casual spaces, 30-50 lux for evening relaxation

Melanopic Daylight Efficacy Ratio (MDER)

  • What it measures: How effectively a light source stimulates melanopsin photoreceptors compared to natural daylight
  • How we test: Specialized equipment calculating the ratio between melanopic effect and standard daylight
  • Health impact: Higher MDER values in evening lighting suppress melatonin and disrupt sleep
  • Optimal values: Higher ratios (0.8-1.0) during daytime, lower ratios (below 0.5) in evening settings

Spectral Gaps/Distribution

  • What it measures: Continuity and balance of the light spectrum, identifying missing or disproportionate wavelengths
  • How we test: Using spectroradiometers to create spectral power distribution graphs
  • Health impact: Spectral gaps can cause visual discomfort, reduce color rendering, and impact biological responses
  • Optimal values: Relatively smooth spectral distribution without significant gaps

Lower Risk Factors

Color Rendering Index (CRI)

  • What it measures: How accurately a light source renders colors compared to natural light
  • How we test: Using spectrophotometers to compare color sample rendering against natural light
  • Health impact: Poor color rendering causes eye strain and visual fatigue
  • Optimal values: Above 90, with 100 being perfect color rendering

Color Spectrum

  • What it measures: Distribution of light across different wavelengths, showing color proportions
  • How we test: Using spectrophotometers, measuring intensity across the visible spectrum (380-780nm)
  • Health impact: An Imbalanced spectrum with excessive blue can disrupt circadian rhythms
  • Optimal values: Balanced distribution with appropriate blue content during the day, minimal blue in the evening

Creating Light-Optimized Environments

These three light-responsive systems work synergistically, requiring thoughtful integration in our built environments. Building design should prioritize natural daylighting not just for energy efficiency, but as a fundamental health intervention. This means maximizing daylight penetration during working hours while providing control systems for appropriate evening lighting.

The lighting quality parameters we test, from flicker percentage and color temperature to spectral distribution and UV content, directly impact all three systems. High-risk factors like excessive blue content at night, high flicker rates, and UV emissions can simultaneously disrupt circadian rhythms, strain the visual system, and potentially damage skin and eyes over time.

By understanding and optimizing for all three light-responsive systems through comprehensive testing and thoughtful design, we can create environments that not only support immediate visual tasks but also promote long-term health, better sleep, enhanced mood, and reduced risk of chronic disease. The goal is lighting that works in harmony with our biology rather than against it.